Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Andrews: Capital Mobility and State Autonomy

Andrews, DM. 1994. Capital mobility and state autonomy: toward a structural theory of international monetary relations. International Studies Quarterly: 193-218.

Capital mobility, it is argued in this piece, has become restrictive enought to be highlighted as a structure in the international system. This paper introduces the "capital mobility hypothesis". Also, it argues against generalizing about the effects that capital mobility will have on all states.

In exploring others who have looked at this topic: "In essence, the central claim of these theorists is that when capital is highly mobile across international borders, the sustainable macroeconomic policy options available to states are systematically circumscribed. International financial integration, so the argument goes, has raised the costs associated with pursuing monetary policies that diverge from regional or international trends. While differences in national preferences, the causal beliefs of policymakers and institutional affiliations may help shape particular patterns of adaptation, proponents of what may be termed the 'capital mobility hypothesis' maintain that changes in the external constraint confronting all states constitute a structural cause of observed shifts in the patterns of states' monetary policy behavior over time" (193-4).

"The central claim associated with the capital mobility hypothesis is that financial integration has increased the costs of pursuing divergent monetary objectives, resulting in structural incentives for monetary adjustment" (203).